<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The PPC Blog by Matthew Umbro &#187; MSN adCenter</title>
	<atom:link href="http://theppcblog.com/category/msn-adcenter/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://theppcblog.com</link>
	<description>Your Source for PPC News and Opinions</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Jan 2012 19:28:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>PPC Chat Roundup &#8211; April 5th, 2011</title>
		<link>http://theppcblog.com/2011/04/ppc-chat-roundup-april-5th-2011/</link>
		<comments>http://theppcblog.com/2011/04/ppc-chat-roundup-april-5th-2011/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Apr 2011 02:31:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Matthew Umbro</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Google AdWords]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MSN adCenter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pay-Per-Click (PPC)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PPC Chat]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PPC Management]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theppcblog.com/?p=421</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[PPC Chat is off and running as the inaugural event drew many attendees to discuss several prominent PPC topics.  Seven of the ten questions were asked in the hour and ten minute chat as we saw many great points raised.  Among the topics discussed were: Audience Based Targeting Many pointed out that Google’s Display Network [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>PPC Chat is off and running as the inaugural event drew many attendees to discuss several prominent PPC topics.  Seven of the ten questions were asked in the hour and ten minute chat as we saw many great points raised.  Among the topics discussed were:</p>
<p><strong>Audience Based Targeting</strong></p>
<p>Many pointed out that Google’s Display Network (GDN) is making good improvements, but still lacks the user volunteered content that Facebook and LinkedIn have at their disposal.  Managed placements are still the best way to target audiences in the GDN.  Gathering user content could be the reason for Google’s recent social ventures, including +1 and better Gmail ads.  <a title="David Szetela on Twitter" href="http://twitter.com/#%21/szetela" target="_blank">David Szetela</a> also brought up the notion of “audience-need targeting” being better than keyword targeting, but again, not as effective as managed placements.</p>
<p><span id="more-421"></span></p>
<p><strong>MSN adCenter</strong></p>
<p>This topic was the elephant in the room as many are not fond of adCenter’s interface and features.  Interestingly enough, some advertisers have seen poorer performance since the Yahoo/Bing search alliance.  Szetela mentioned turning off Yahoo Search Partners to combat this issue.  <a title="Chris Kostecki on Twitter" href="http://twitter.com/#%21/chriskos" target="_blank">Chris Kostecki</a> also mentioned that adCenter conversion tracking is convoluted.  Many also made note that we should be able to have separate bids for Yahoo and MSN, something that Melissa Mackey <a title="Separating Bids in Yahoo and MSN" href="http://beyondthepaid.blogspot.com/2011/02/microsofts-adcenter-continues-to.html" target="_blank">argues for strongly</a>.  The consensus is even though adCenter has a much less friendly UI than AdWords, the platform is still a player in the PPC industry. <a title="Andy Groller on Twitter" href="http://twitter.com/#!/AndyGroller" target="_blank"> Andy Groller</a> noted that adCenter warrants attention due to less competition and lower cost-per-clicks (CPCs).</p>
<p><strong>Quality Score</strong></p>
<p>Another hot topic was AdWords quality score (isn’t it always?)  Low quality scores aren’t desirable, but many argued that as long as these keywords provide a solid ROI, conversion rate, and/or CPA they are fine to keep in the account.  My words were “If a keyword has a great conversion rate or is bringing in much revenue but has poor QS I&#8217;m keeping it.”  We all know that click-thru-rate (CTR) is a primary factor that Google uses to determine quality score, but Szetela debunked the landing page factor.  He states there is almost zero correlation between landing pages and quality scores.</p>
<p><strong>AdWords Ad Extensions</strong></p>
<p>Everyone was in agreement that ad extensions lift CTR and help overall campaign performance.  Sitelinks allow you four more chances to include additional benefits and calls to action while product listings qualify traffic prior to the click.  Perhaps the biggest benefit of ad extensions is that they take up more real estate and contain more links to your site.</p>
<p>The first PPC Chat is in the books, but we’re going to do it again next week, same day and time!</p>
<p><a class="a2a_dd a2a_target addtoany_share_save" href="http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Ftheppcblog.com%2F2011%2F04%2Fppc-chat-roundup-april-5th-2011%2F&amp;title=PPC%20Chat%20Roundup%20%26%238211%3B%20April%205th%2C%202011" id="wpa2a_2"><img src="http://theppcblog.com/wp-content/plugins/add-to-any/share_save_171_16.png" width="171" height="16" alt="Share"/></a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://theppcblog.com/2011/04/ppc-chat-roundup-april-5th-2011/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Are You Calculating Total PPC Campaign Revenue?</title>
		<link>http://theppcblog.com/2010/10/are-you-calculating-total-ppc-campaign-revenue/</link>
		<comments>http://theppcblog.com/2010/10/are-you-calculating-total-ppc-campaign-revenue/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Oct 2010 03:21:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Matthew Umbro</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Google AdWords]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MSN adCenter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pay-Per-Click (PPC)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Yahoo! Search Marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PPC revenue]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theppcblog.com/?p=383</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The success of most e-commerce pay-per-click (PPC) campaigns is determined by the amount of revenue made and the height of the return on investment (ROI).  Sounds like a no brainer, huh?  Ultimately money talks and if you aren’t seeing your desired results the PPC budget will be cut.  Too often companies only calculate PPC revenue [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The success of most e-commerce pay-per-click (PPC) campaigns is determined by the amount of revenue made and the height of the return on investment (ROI).  Sounds like a no brainer, huh?  Ultimately money talks and if you aren’t seeing your desired results the PPC budget will be cut.  Too often companies only calculate PPC revenue as purchases made from the site.  I’m here to tell you that PPC revenue can be made through other channels, but oftentimes these earnings are not attributed to the PPC campaign, which is a huge mistake!</p>
<p><span id="more-383"></span></p>
<p>Think of this notion in terms of <a title="AdWords Search Funnels" href="http://adwords.blogspot.com/2010/03/new-reports-adwords-search-funnels.html" target="_blank">AdWords Search Funnels</a>.  Someone may search for “nike shoes” and click the ad.  This person leaves the site without purchasing anything but then searches for “nike running shoes” 2 days later and makes a purchase.  The conversion will be attributed to “nike running shoes,” but the term “nike shoes” was the first click and assisted in this purchase.  <ins datetime="2010-10-11T22:45" cite="mailto:Matt%20Umbro"></ins></p>
<p>Here are 2 ways that PPC assists in making revenue, but isn’t always recognized.</p>
<p><strong>Visitors Contacting You through the Site</strong></p>
<p>Many sites have conversion and revenue tracking setup for online purchases, but some do not track contact inquiries and phone calls.  Let’s pretend that I am a retailer researching which brand of men’s running shoes I’d like to sell in my store.  I do a search for “men’s running shoes” and see ads show up for several brands, including: Adidas, Nike, New Balance, and Reebok.  Researching each brand, I decide to carry New Balance running shoes in my store.  I email the company and a week later (after several more back and forth emails) I agree to buy $5,000 worth of New Balance product every month for the next 12 months.  That click on the New Balance ad for the term “men’s running shoes” netted the company a revenue of $60,000.</p>
<p>Without digging deeper, this click would be deemed as yielding no revenue.  Though the conversion might be tracked, it would require follow-up on the company’s part to definitively say this email resulted in revenue.  Just because the conversion process is longer in this situation, it doesn’t mean revenue shouldn’t be attributed to the correct source.</p>
<p>Through your analytics program, every form submission and click on an email address can be tracked.  If your analytics and your sales team are aligned then attributing revenue to the right source is simple, but this isn’t always the case.  Additionally, with call tracking software the source can be identified.  Even without call tracking software, it’s good practice to ask callers how they found you.  Not all customers are going to make a purchase at the first touch point.  Some will contact you and won’t purchase through the site (e.g.: via phone) so this revenue needs to be appropriately attributed.</p>
<p><strong>Purchases Made in Person</strong></p>
<p>Let’s take the same example from above, but say I’m looking to buy myself a pair of running shoes.  I do the same search for “men’s running shoes” and see several different ads.  After browsing each site I decide that I really like a specific model New Balance offers.  I’m hesitant to buy online because I don’t know how the shoe will fit so I go to a New Balance store and make my purchase.  The revenue for this pair of shoes is attributed to the retailer.  As far as New Balance is concerned, the click on the ad yielded no revenue.</p>
<p>In all fairness, attributing revenue to the PPC campaign is extremely difficult in this situation.  Aside from asking the consumer how he heard about New Balance (and even then you aren’t guaranteed the true answer) there is no way to attribute the sale to the PPC campaign.  If your site contains a store locator you can see how many visitors use it, but again, this isn’t a definitive means of tracking revenue.  The bottom line in this case is that some consumers who click your PPC ads are more comfortable purchasing in store.  Though it is nearly impossible to calculate an exact revenue, you should always take this notion into account when determining PPC campaign success.</p>
<p><strong>Conclusion</strong></p>
<p>Going the extra step to determine total PPC campaign revenue can be difficult, but it’s absolutely necessary since you want to make sure the PPC campaign gets the credit it deserves. Don’t think just in black and white terms.  You must understand that additional PPC revenue is generated through other channels and at later times.</p>
<p>How do you make sure you are tracking total PPC campaign revenue?  I’d love to hear your thoughts.</p>
<p><a class="a2a_dd a2a_target addtoany_share_save" href="http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Ftheppcblog.com%2F2010%2F10%2Fare-you-calculating-total-ppc-campaign-revenue%2F&amp;title=Are%20You%20Calculating%20Total%20PPC%20Campaign%20Revenue%3F" id="wpa2a_4"><img src="http://theppcblog.com/wp-content/plugins/add-to-any/share_save_171_16.png" width="171" height="16" alt="Share"/></a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://theppcblog.com/2010/10/are-you-calculating-total-ppc-campaign-revenue/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Mobile PPC Poll</title>
		<link>http://theppcblog.com/2010/06/mobile-ppc-poll/</link>
		<comments>http://theppcblog.com/2010/06/mobile-ppc-poll/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jun 2010 23:56:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Matthew Umbro</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Google AdWords]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MSN adCenter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pay-Per-Click (PPC)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mobile PPC]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theppcblog.com/?p=281</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I am working on a mobile pay-per-click (PPC) blog entry and would like your input.  Please answer the questions below.  I thank you in advance! [poll id="2"] [poll id="3"] [poll id="4"]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am working on a mobile pay-per-click (PPC) blog entry and would like your input.  Please answer the questions below.  I thank you in advance!</p>
<p>[poll id="2"]</p>
<p>[poll id="3"]</p>
<p>[poll id="4"]</p>
<p><a class="a2a_dd a2a_target addtoany_share_save" href="http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Ftheppcblog.com%2F2010%2F06%2Fmobile-ppc-poll%2F&amp;title=Mobile%20PPC%20Poll" id="wpa2a_6"><img src="http://theppcblog.com/wp-content/plugins/add-to-any/share_save_171_16.png" width="171" height="16" alt="Share"/></a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://theppcblog.com/2010/06/mobile-ppc-poll/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Is Your PPC Glass Half Empty or Half Full?</title>
		<link>http://theppcblog.com/2010/05/is-your-ppc-glass-half-empty-or-half-full/</link>
		<comments>http://theppcblog.com/2010/05/is-your-ppc-glass-half-empty-or-half-full/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 May 2010 16:48:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Matthew Umbro</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Google AdWords]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MSN adCenter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pay-Per-Click (PPC)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PPC reports]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theppcblog.com/?p=257</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This post was written by Robert Brady from http://righteousmarketing.com. Robert can be reached via email at robert@righteousmarketing.com or through Twitter @robert_brady Thomas Edison once said: “I have not failed. I&#8217;ve just found 10,000 ways that won&#8217;t work.” Often we evaluate our PPC efforts from the same perspective; looking at keywords that were too expensive, ad [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>This post was written by Robert Brady from <a title="Righteous Marketing" href="http://righteousmarketing.com" target="_blank">http://righteousmarketing.com</a>.  Robert can be reached via email at <a href="mailto:robert@righteousmarketing.com" target="_blank">robert@righteousmarketing.com</a> or through Twitter <a title="Robert Brady on Twitter" href="http://twitter.com/robert_brady" target="_blank">@robert_brady</a></em></p>
<p>Thomas Edison once said:</p>
<p>“I have not failed. I&#8217;ve just found 10,000 ways that won&#8217;t work.”</p>
<p>Often we evaluate our PPC efforts from the same perspective; looking at keywords that were too expensive, ad copy that had a low CTR and landing pages that didn’t convert for mistakes to avoid in the future. The problem is that by Edison’s experience you may still be thousands of mistakes from the right answer.</p>
<p><span id="more-257"></span></p>
<p><strong>Find Your Bright Spots</strong></p>
<p>For a moment, flip your perspective. Look at your PPC account and ask “What worked?” and then ask yourself “How can I apply those successes to other areas of my account?” But how do you find the bright spots quickly?</p>
<p><strong>Reports </strong></p>
<p>Not all reports are created equal. I polled a group of PPC experts and asked what reports they ran on a daily, weekly, and monthly basis. Here are the results:</p>
<p>Which AdWords report(s) do you run monthly?</p>
<p><a href="http://theppcblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/05/monthly-report-viewing.jpg"><img class="size-full wp-image-259 alignnone" title="monthly-report-viewing" src="http://theppcblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/05/monthly-report-viewing.jpg" alt="" width="325" height="371" /></a></p>
<p>Which AdWords report(s) do you run weekly?</p>
<p><a href="http://theppcblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/05/weekly-report-viewing.jpg"><img class="size-full wp-image-262 alignnone" title="weekly-report-viewing" src="http://theppcblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/05/weekly-report-viewing.jpg" alt="" width="319" height="371" /></a></p>
<p>Which AdWords report(s) do you run daily?</p>
<p><a href="http://theppcblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/05/daily-report-viewing.jpg"><img class="size-full wp-image-263 alignnone" title="daily-report-viewing" src="http://theppcblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/05/daily-report-viewing.jpg" alt="" width="318" height="371" /></a></p>
<p><strong>Interpreting Reports</strong></p>
<p>Campaign Performance– This was one of the most checked reports by the pros. This high-level report will show you which campaigns are producing the best CTR and cost/conversion. Once you know where the best results are coming from, use further reports to find the golden nuggets.</p>
<p>Placement/Keyword Performance – Another top choice, this report will show you specifically which keywords are producing the best results. You can then consider bid changes to improve position for top converting keywords.</p>
<p><a title="Search Query Performance" href="http://righteousmarketing.com/small-business-ppc-search-query-reports" target="_blank">Search Query Performance</a> – This report will tell you the exact phrases that your customers are searching. Here you’ll find variations you would have missed otherwise. Consider adding winners to the appropriate ad group or creating a new ad group if you find a trend. Hint: this report can be run right in the interface.</p>
<p>The <a title="Equivalent Reports" href="http://community.microsoftadvertising.com/blogs/advertiser/archive/2010/05/25/everything-you-ever-wanted-to-know-about-microsoft-adcenter-reports-but-were-afraid-to-ask.aspx" target="_blank">equivalent reports</a> can also be run for Bing (Microsoft) and Yahoo (which will merge at some point in the not too distant future).</p>
<p><strong>Spread The Wealth</strong></p>
<p>Now you’ll know which keywords, ad copy and landing pages are successfully delivering traffic and conversions. Ask yourself what underperforming areas could benefit from this insight. Make some changes and then test, test, test.</p>
<p><a class="a2a_dd a2a_target addtoany_share_save" href="http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Ftheppcblog.com%2F2010%2F05%2Fis-your-ppc-glass-half-empty-or-half-full%2F&amp;title=Is%20Your%20PPC%20Glass%20Half%20Empty%20or%20Half%20Full%3F" id="wpa2a_8"><img src="http://theppcblog.com/wp-content/plugins/add-to-any/share_save_171_16.png" width="171" height="16" alt="Share"/></a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://theppcblog.com/2010/05/is-your-ppc-glass-half-empty-or-half-full/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Get the Most Out of Your Limited PPC Campaign Budget</title>
		<link>http://theppcblog.com/2010/04/get-the-most-out-of-your-limited-ppc-campaign-budget/</link>
		<comments>http://theppcblog.com/2010/04/get-the-most-out-of-your-limited-ppc-campaign-budget/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Apr 2010 23:02:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Matthew Umbro</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Google AdWords]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MSN adCenter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pay-Per-Click (PPC)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Yahoo! Search Marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Conversion Rate]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theppcblog.com/?p=181</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A major selling point of Google AdWords is that it allows advertisers to control their costs. Whether you spend $5,000 a month or $50 the choice is yours. On the surface this is a great model, but as most pay-per-click (PPC) managers would tell you, the smaller your budget the harder it is to compete [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A major selling point of Google AdWords is that it allows advertisers to control their costs.  Whether you spend $5,000 a month or $50 the choice is yours.  On the surface this is a great model, but as most pay-per-click (PPC) managers would tell you, the smaller your budget the harder it is to compete for more ad impressions.  Yes, more conservative budgets look bigger in smaller search engines such as Yahoo and Bing. However, these engines make up very little of the market share compared to Google.</p>
<p>No matter the size of your budget, you have to practice intelligent PPC tactics.  These tactics include tightly-themed ad groups, keyword-dense text ads with strong calls to action, and relevant landing pages.  Obviously, a higher budget allows you to do more, like bid on more keywords and place your ads on <a title="Tips for Advertising on the Content Network" href="http://theppcblog.com/2010/01/tips-for-advertising-on-the-content-network/" target="_blank">contextually relevant sites</a>, but without knowledge of PPC techniques your budget is the least of your problems.</p>
<p><span id="more-181"></span></p>
<p>Managers of PPC campaigns with small monthly budgets need to be creative at times in order to spend funds as wisely as possible.  The list below consists of realistic methods to get the best clicks with a limited budget.  By the way, I consider a small budget to be less than $200 a month.  It is important to note that these methods are often utilized in campaigns with large budgets, but they become even more necessary with limited funds.</p>
<p><strong>The Fewer Campaigns the Better </strong></p>
<p>AdWords accounts can have up to 25 campaigns, but with a small budget, less is more.  Say your daily budget is $10 and you have 2 campaigns:</p>
<p>Campaign #1 – $6 daily budget<br />
Campaign #2 – $4 daily budget</p>
<p>When you introduce a third campaign your daily budget is broken out like this:</p>
<p>Campaign #1 – $4.75 daily budget<br />
Campaign #2 – $2.25 daily budget<br />
Campaign #3 – $3 daily budget</p>
<p>Adding a campaign to your account decreases the funds allocated to other campaigns, in order to accommodate the $10 daily budget.  Assuming you keep your keyword bids the same, your average CPC will not change, but you will get fewer clicks per campaign.  In the era of <a title="First Page Bid Estimates" href="http://adwords.google.com/support/aw/bin/topic.py?hl=en&amp;topic=16075" target="_blank">first page bid estimates</a> lowering your bids is not always a viable option.  As your campaign daily budgets decrease so does your threshold for ad impressions.  Sometimes smaller accounts have to consist of fewer campaigns for more exposure, which leads to my second point.</p>
<p><strong>Bid on More Long-Tailed Keywords</strong></p>
<p>Generally, the longer your keyword the less expensive it is going to be due to less competition.  For example, “baseball glove” might have a first page bid estimate of $1 where “first baseman’s baseball glove,” is only $0.50.  These long-tailed terms are your friends because they not only cost less but they are better targeted.  You will inevitably see fewer impressions for these keywords, but get better quality clicks.</p>
<p><strong>Eliminate Junk Early</strong></p>
<p><strong> </strong></p>
<p>The ability to test keywords, text ads, and landing pages is important, but campaigns with small budgets do not have the luxury to wait for definitive results.  With a larger budget you might allow a text ad 500 impressions before you make a judgment of how well it is converting compared to other ads.  With a smaller budget 500 impressions would take too long to accrue, so you have to make a decision sooner.  Or you might have a keyword that has been clicked 10 times without any conversions vs. a keyword that has been clicked 8 times with 2 conversions.  The sample sizes are small, however, so is your budget and you have to spend funds on what is working.</p>
<p>PPC campaigns with small budgets have a lot less margin for error than those with substantial funds.  However, by practicing the right PPC techniques and taking advantage of these three methods, PPC campaigns with smaller budgets can succeed.</p>
<p><a class="a2a_dd a2a_target addtoany_share_save" href="http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Ftheppcblog.com%2F2010%2F04%2Fget-the-most-out-of-your-limited-ppc-campaign-budget%2F&amp;title=Get%20the%20Most%20Out%20of%20Your%20Limited%20PPC%20Campaign%20Budget" id="wpa2a_10"><img src="http://theppcblog.com/wp-content/plugins/add-to-any/share_save_171_16.png" width="171" height="16" alt="Share"/></a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://theppcblog.com/2010/04/get-the-most-out-of-your-limited-ppc-campaign-budget/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>MSN adCenter Still Using P4P?</title>
		<link>http://theppcblog.com/2009/10/msn-adcenter-still-using-p4p/</link>
		<comments>http://theppcblog.com/2009/10/msn-adcenter-still-using-p4p/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2009 23:35:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Matthew Umbro</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Google AdWords]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MSN adCenter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pay-Per-Click (PPC)]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theppcblog.com/?p=38</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As I was adding new text ads to an account in MSN adCenter I noticed the URL: Is it odd to anyone else that MSN still uses the acronym “P4P”? For the most part this term has been replaced by PPC. P4P, or pay-for-placement, was considered too broad. P4P could mean buying a directory listing [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As I was adding new text ads to an account in MSN adCenter I noticed the URL:</p>
<p><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-40" title="Microsoft_P4P" src="http://theppcblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/10/Microsoft_P4P1.jpg" alt="Microsoft_P4P" width="439" height="21" /></p>
<p>Is it odd to anyone else that MSN still uses the acronym “P4P”?  For the most part this term has been replaced by PPC.  P4P, or pay-for-placement, was considered too broad.  P4P could mean buying a directory listing in Yahoo! or banner advertising on a site, not just the conventional paid search engine platforms.  In fact, P4P could mean buying an ad in a newspaper!</p>
<p>I’ve always found this P4P mention in the adCenter interface to be a bit surprising.  I know it is a relatively small issue, but MSN desires to be the number one search engine (the advent of Bing, ladies and gentleman).  MSN adCenter is a good paid platform, but it will never eclipse Google AdWords if it cannot keep up with the current lingo.</p>
<p>I am making too big a deal of this issue?  Post a comment and let me know.</p>
<p><a class="a2a_dd a2a_target addtoany_share_save" href="http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Ftheppcblog.com%2F2009%2F10%2Fmsn-adcenter-still-using-p4p%2F&amp;title=MSN%20adCenter%20Still%20Using%20P4P%3F" id="wpa2a_12"><img src="http://theppcblog.com/wp-content/plugins/add-to-any/share_save_171_16.png" width="171" height="16" alt="Share"/></a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://theppcblog.com/2009/10/msn-adcenter-still-using-p4p/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

